David Tiley

David Tiley was the Editor of Screenhub from 2005 until he became Content Lead for Film in 2021 with a special interest in policy. He is a writer in screen media with a long career in educational programs, documentary, and government funding, with a side order in script editing. He values curiosity, humour and objectivity in support of Australian visions and the art of storytelling.

David Tiley's Latest Articles

News

Ratings: Tuesday, 13th May 2014

The budget attracted strong interest but the stability elsewhere said they are not true TV tragics.

News

MIFF: predestined to hug a Spierig

The Melbourne International Film festival goes local for its opening night, and gets some branding kudos.

Features

Budget: shocked industry faces cuts to key agency

No fun for the national broadcasters, but horrible for Screen Australia. And hard times for games developers too.

News

Budget: back end chaos heading our way?

With the budget due out tomorrow, the rumour/leaking/logical guesswork machine is still spitting out titbits about the sector.

News

Screen Australia: Oliver announces date to leave orphanage

Chris Oliver, senior manager for state and industry partnerships, leaves Screen Australia on July 4th.

Features

Screen Australia: Enterprise Program rebuilt, open for further comment

The Enterprise Program is probably the key tool which has changed the sector. Now we see a new box of…

News

Ratings: Sunday, 11th May 2014

The Eurovision Song Contest was a triumph for SBS, bringing it to 10% - almost.

Features

All3Media: key British and international production company sold to US

As All3Media passes to the US, really big meets truly huge and absolutely monstrous in a deal of the mega-titans.

Features

Neighbours: issue larger than single production

After 25 years of relative industrial peace, the people behind the scenes of the Ramsay St make-believe are using the…

News

Ratings: Thursday, 8th May 2014

Ten makes a massive break for glory, while everyone else looks bedraggled. How could this be?

1 200 201 202 203 204 264