Every member of the board of the Independent Cinemas Association of Australia has been summoned to give evidence on behalf of Omnilab Media, and counsel for Digital Cinema Networks has set out to destroy their credibility as witnesses. Why are they making it easy for him?
The other question might be: Why has counsel for Omnilab allowed them to give evidence based on affidavits that contradict facts already established in the original trial, and upheld on appeal?
